Archive for the ‘Twitter’ Category

  • First Day of School

    1

    My summer will officially end at 2:50 p.m. when I go to my first class of my last year in college. With the start of a new year comes a plethora of opportunities—you can anyone you want to be (why yes, I will take that flier to try out for your a cappella group and Bhangra dance troupe!). Fortunately, though, I know I want to be a journalist, and I have spent the past three summers working to ease the transition from student-journalist to professional, paid, real-person, real-job journalist (by the way, my resume and clips pages are all up to date with this summer’s activities).

    While they don’t get paid and normally don’t get published by traditional media outlets during the year, student-journalists are still journalists. As Robert Niles of the Knight Digital Media Center points out in his advise for journalism students blog post, the career of a student-journalist has already begun.

    His other advice includes:

    • Everyone who posts online has the potential to be a journalist. Immediate access to a global publishing medium allows any source to become a breaking news reporter, even if it is only for a fleeting moment.
    • Your career is only as strong as your network. Networking has taken a digital turn thanks to the rise of social media. Now, you no longer have to have met someone in the flesh to make a professional connection.
    • Get passionate about a field and start to master it. Niles recommends turning it into a second major. My second major, for the record, is Spanish—I consider it a tool to hopefully allow me to reach more people and travel across the globe.
    • Conduct yourself as a journalist, at all times, and never stop reporting. This goes back to bullet point number one: anything posted online has to potential to be newsworthy to someone else. Journalists by definition are unbiased and open-minded—any hint of bias could come back to become your own personal Kate Moss cocaine scandal.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Are New Media Tools Worthless?

    2

    How much is Twitter worth? Well, according to 1,981 people surveyed by the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California, it is worth zero dollars. In a capitalist, money-driven society, some would consider this product worthless. Almost half of Internet users (49 percent to be exact) reported using free micro-blogs like Twitter, according to the report.

    Jeffrey I. Cole, the director of USC’s Center for the Digital Future, tells us media folk the painful truth we already know:

    Such an extreme finding that produced a zero response underscores the difficulty of getting Internet users to pay for anything that they already receive for free

    Other new media tools received less-than-favorable responses about their value as well. According to those surveyed, 50 percent of Internet users never instant message, 79 percent never work on a blog, 80 percent never participate in chat rooms and 85 percent never make or receive Internet phone calls (sorry Google Voice).

    So while content providers and aggregation services continue to roll out new Twitter products (Google now lets you search Twitter lists! The new UberTwitter App saves you the awkwardness of unfollowing that person who tweets too often by letting you “mute” his or her tweets!), the question is, who are these for? If reporters and editors are the only ones who get excited and use new media tools, does this mean they officially count as a distraction instead of an asset?

    The survey continues to bring forth good news by exploring the level of trust people have in information on the Internet. A record-low 61 percent of users said that only half or less of online information is reliable, and 53 percent said that most or all of the information provided by search engines is reliable and accurate, down from 64 percent in 2006.

    The price a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service is linked to its perceived value, according to Jerry Bernstein, the founder of St. Louis-based Price Improvement Team. So if Internet users do not trust a source, why would they pay for that information? (cue 60 Minutes ticking clock)

    Not all real estate has plunged in value—the historic buildings in Oxford are still considered priceless by many who see them.

  • Sports Journalism, Twitter and the World Cup

    0

    As someone who has spent a fair amount of time in sports journalism, I am used to the realization that, for most newspapers, the

    sports section is the most popular with readers. Sports stories drive the most hits, engage people that are only casually interested in “news,” and lend themselves well to creating promotional items that can generate extra revenue for their perspective papers.

    Europe loves its soccer (as evidenced by my picture from Real Madrid vs. Xerez in Estadio Santiago Bernabeau, September 20, 2009).

    And now I have another piece of evidence to bolster my claims—Twitter announced over the weekend that the Japan vs. Demark soccer game set a new record for Tweets per second (TPS). When the referee blew the final whistle, the Twitter crew counted 3,283 TPS (They also note that the Netherlands vs. Cameroon game ended six minutes earlier). The old record? Another sporting event, of course—3,085 TPS at the end of the Los Angeles Lakers victory over the Boston Celtics in game 7 of the NBA finals. The Twitter blog also said that, “The second week of the World Cup continued to see consistent spikes in TPS after goals that are remarkable increases over our average of 750 TPS.”

    Techcrunch.com goes into more detail:

    Last week the all time highs were in terms of Tweets-per-second took place after goals were scored in the following games: Japan scores against Cameroon on June 14 in their 1-0 victory (2,940 TPS), Brazil scores their first goal against North Korea in their 2-1 June 14 victory (2,928 TPS) and Mexico ties South Africa in their June 11 game (2,704 TPS).

    One of the most remarkable observations from this data is that none of these games involve the United States. As stateside journalists, it is easy to get caught up in our United States (note—not American) bubble. The audience for news, though, is worldwide.

    So, why is this helpful for Journalists?

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Rolling Stone’s breaking news fail

    0

    Photo taken from El_Enigma's photostream on Flicker.

    Rolling Stone acted more like a 1960s rock band today than a magazine operating in the 21st century. It had a story that was bound to spark national debate—General Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. military official in Afghanistan who commands the 130,000 soldiers in the NATO coalition, is not too fond of his civilian counterparts. In the profile piece, aptly titled, “The Runaway General,”  McChrystal and his aids take shots at Karl W. Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan (who, by nature of his position, is the top U.S. civilian in that country) and Vice President Joe Biden, who is no. 2 in command back on U.S. soil. Can you say public relations disaster for the U.S. Goverment?

    As expected, the fallout was severe—every major news organization picked the story up, Obama ordered McChrystal back home and may fire him…and Rolling Stone did not even bother putting the story on its website until 11:00 a.m.

    What?

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Words, Words, Words.

    0

    I love words. Don’t get me wrong, editing video and taking the perfectly-framed picture are rewarding journalistic activities, but I’m a writer at heart (and a good English major – bonus points if you recognized the title of this post was a quote from Hamlet). With that said, words were in many headlines last week (pun intended):

    • The Awl reported that Phil Corbett, the  standards editor at the New York Times, banned the word “tweet” from the newspaper and in online articles. Corbett put the word in the category of colloquialisms, neologisms and jargon—all pitfalls journalists try to avoid. His rationale? People who use Twitter get the verb—but Corbett does not consider Twitter mainstream yet. Corbett responded on the Times Topics blog by saying he did not ban the word outright—his memo was just a reminder that the word should not appear in hard news stories.
    • A few days before the Times was chirping about Twitter (another pun intended), The Gray Lady issued 50 Fancy Words, the list the top 50 words that most often stumped its readership. Many (okay, most) stumped me as well.
    • And finally, McSweeney’s ode to the font Comic Sans. Be warned – the language is “colorful” to put it one way. On a more serious note, font choice is a serious matter—design gurus meticulously look for just the right one. And even those famous for their style, such as The New Yorker, keep tinkering until they get it just right.

    Happy word painting. Exit pursued by a bear

    They say a picture is worth a thousand words: well, that's about one for each bike in this shot of Amsterdam

  • New wrapping for Twitter links

    0

    (Blog update: resume is live. Look for clips tomorrow)

    Twitter is the easiest way for journalists to establish a presence on the web. So when its developers announced changes to the way links are counted against the 140 character limit of individual tweets, people noticed.

    Twitter’s Sean Garrett announced the policy change today in a Twitter blog post, aptly titled Links and Twitter: Lengths Shouldn’t Matter. The official reason for the change is to foil the spread of malware, phishing and other web dangers. All links will be wrapped into a t.co URL starting sometime this summer.

    Will this announcement change the way people tweet?

    My guess: No, not really. Its biggest impact will probably be in the way tweets are displayed on screen.

    Twitter has not decided exactly what the display change will be. Garrett gives this example in his post:

    » Read the rest of the entry..