Archive for the ‘Journalism’ Category

  • How to Save Journalism

    0

    Times Square sold its soul to advertisers long ago. Would the media be doing the same thing if it put ads in emails sent by reporters?

    Last week, Andy Boyle, a journalist who is a friend of mine, put out a tweet that caught my attention:

    An e-mail from a guy at a newspaper just contained an advertisement at the bottom. So. Can e-mail ads save journalism?

    The Pew Research Center estimated back in September 2009 that about 58 percent of all American adults send or read an email on an average day.  This compares with just 17 percent of people who say a print national newspaper is part of their daily news diet (slide 16).  But we already knew print is dying, right?

    [side note - it would be inaccurate of me not to report that the same Pew survey says that 50 percent of people view a local print paper on a typical day. That makes me wonder what all exactly qualifies as a local print paper.]

    So, there is no question that placing advertisements in a journalist’s email would help advertisers reach a wider audience than if they advertised in a printed paper. If a reporter is not out in the field, than he or she is likely sending out emails to sources and subjects. On top of that, it would be fairly easy to identify the demographics of certain audiences—for example, a sports reporter will probably be emailing men in the coveted 18-49 age group. A local advertiser could team with the local beat reporter, and so on.

    We already know the technology is available—see the ads at the top of your Gmail messages based on the content of your emails as exhibit A. Journalism, though, has a much stricter set of ethical guidelines than most professions.

    So, would selling ad space in reporters’ emails be ethical?

    I can’t pretend to know. Ethical issues are rarely black and white, and history is rife with examples of how media outlets use advertisements in ways that violate unspoken (and sometimes spoken) ethical rules. Obviously, the reporter and editors should play no role in the arranging and selection of these ads—let the business people take care of that. Local TV news has been using product placement since at least 2008 during its broadcasts—is that really different from letting ads run at the bottom of emails containing a non-endorsement disclaimer?

    Out of this ethical debate, there is one certainty—print outlets need to find a new advertising model, and they needed to find it yesterday. It’s through outside-the-box ideas such as this that will give birth to the new business model.

  • The Story Behind the Story: Kyrie Irving Narrative

    0

    Duke Chronicle Photo by Maya Robinson

    My first story as associate editor for Towerview, the monthly magazine published by Duke’s independent daily student newspaper, The Chronicle, hit the web July 1. It is a narrative feature on Duke’s incoming freshman point guard, Kyrie Irving. With no self-promotion from me, it has received 4,898 hits as of 11:45 p.m. and is the second-most popular story on dukechronicle.com. It has also received 35 “likes” via the Facebook Like button on the page, which is the metric I use to judge its  popularity with the target demographic (see my post titled The Facebook Frenemy for more info on the Facebook Like button’s takeover of the web).

    The reporting was challenging. It was my first assignment after I completed The Poynter Institute’s  College Fellowship, so I was eager to put all of my new reporting tips and tricks to work. Unfortunately, I was in Dallas and St. Petersburg, Florida, while Kyrie and his father were in New Jersey, so all of my interviews were held over the phone. Not ideal. Also not ideal were the fact that my MacBook was in the store for repairs when I needed to write, and that I was on my own to find contact info for Kyrie and whoever else I wanted to talk to for the story.  With a copious amount of research and a little luck, I was able to interview Kyrie, his father, Drederick, his high school basketball coach, Kevin Boyle,  his AAU coach Sandy Pyonin, and a Duke basketball associate head coach, Chris Collins.

    The first tool I used was whitepages.com. Remember that scene from All The President’s Men where the two reporters are pouring over phone books? Whitepages.com is the 21st century equivalent. I found one of the sources there (I won’t say who to protect that person’s privacy), and then he helped me find contact information for a few of the others.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Sports Journalism, Twitter and the World Cup

    0

    As someone who has spent a fair amount of time in sports journalism, I am used to the realization that, for most newspapers, the

    sports section is the most popular with readers. Sports stories drive the most hits, engage people that are only casually interested in “news,” and lend themselves well to creating promotional items that can generate extra revenue for their perspective papers.

    Europe loves its soccer (as evidenced by my picture from Real Madrid vs. Xerez in Estadio Santiago Bernabeau, September 20, 2009).

    And now I have another piece of evidence to bolster my claims—Twitter announced over the weekend that the Japan vs. Demark soccer game set a new record for Tweets per second (TPS). When the referee blew the final whistle, the Twitter crew counted 3,283 TPS (They also note that the Netherlands vs. Cameroon game ended six minutes earlier). The old record? Another sporting event, of course—3,085 TPS at the end of the Los Angeles Lakers victory over the Boston Celtics in game 7 of the NBA finals. The Twitter blog also said that, “The second week of the World Cup continued to see consistent spikes in TPS after goals that are remarkable increases over our average of 750 TPS.”

    Techcrunch.com goes into more detail:

    Last week the all time highs were in terms of Tweets-per-second took place after goals were scored in the following games: Japan scores against Cameroon on June 14 in their 1-0 victory (2,940 TPS), Brazil scores their first goal against North Korea in their 2-1 June 14 victory (2,928 TPS) and Mexico ties South Africa in their June 11 game (2,704 TPS).

    One of the most remarkable observations from this data is that none of these games involve the United States. As stateside journalists, it is easy to get caught up in our United States (note—not American) bubble. The audience for news, though, is worldwide.

    So, why is this helpful for Journalists?

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Rolling Stone’s breaking news fail

    0

    Photo taken from El_Enigma's photostream on Flicker.

    Rolling Stone acted more like a 1960s rock band today than a magazine operating in the 21st century. It had a story that was bound to spark national debate—General Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. military official in Afghanistan who commands the 130,000 soldiers in the NATO coalition, is not too fond of his civilian counterparts. In the profile piece, aptly titled, “The Runaway General,”  McChrystal and his aids take shots at Karl W. Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan (who, by nature of his position, is the top U.S. civilian in that country) and Vice President Joe Biden, who is no. 2 in command back on U.S. soil. Can you say public relations disaster for the U.S. Goverment?

    As expected, the fallout was severe—every major news organization picked the story up, Obama ordered McChrystal back home and may fire him…and Rolling Stone did not even bother putting the story on its website until 11:00 a.m.

    What?

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Words, Words, Words.

    0

    I love words. Don’t get me wrong, editing video and taking the perfectly-framed picture are rewarding journalistic activities, but I’m a writer at heart (and a good English major – bonus points if you recognized the title of this post was a quote from Hamlet). With that said, words were in many headlines last week (pun intended):

    • The Awl reported that Phil Corbett, the  standards editor at the New York Times, banned the word “tweet” from the newspaper and in online articles. Corbett put the word in the category of colloquialisms, neologisms and jargon—all pitfalls journalists try to avoid. His rationale? People who use Twitter get the verb—but Corbett does not consider Twitter mainstream yet. Corbett responded on the Times Topics blog by saying he did not ban the word outright—his memo was just a reminder that the word should not appear in hard news stories.
    • A few days before the Times was chirping about Twitter (another pun intended), The Gray Lady issued 50 Fancy Words, the list the top 50 words that most often stumped its readership. Many (okay, most) stumped me as well.
    • And finally, McSweeney’s ode to the font Comic Sans. Be warned – the language is “colorful” to put it one way. On a more serious note, font choice is a serious matter—design gurus meticulously look for just the right one. And even those famous for their style, such as The New Yorker, keep tinkering until they get it just right.

    Happy word painting. Exit pursued by a bear

    They say a picture is worth a thousand words: well, that's about one for each bike in this shot of Amsterdam

  • The Daily Show: “Are You Journalists, Or Are You Rushing A Sorority?”

    0

    The Daily Show is a valuable news resource.

    While one of the basic functions of the press is to keep those we cover honest, Jon Stewart & Co. do a great job of keeping the media honest.

    In this clip that aired last night, Stewart noted that the press should be asking itself hard questions in the wake of Helen Thomas’s sudden retirement.

    • What is the line between opinion and opinion journalism?
    • When does America’s unwavering defense of Israel begin to compromise our unwavering defense of free speech?
    • Is our media demonstrating a casual bias against the Arab world and the suffering of the Palestinians?

    All are extremely insightful, dead serious questions. I, quite frankly, have not seen these issues getting much coverage in the wake of Ms. Thomas’s departure. Instead, as the clip demonstrates, most of the talk has been about who will get her front row seat.

    The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
    Press You’re Stuck
    www.thedailyshow.com
    Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party


    In addition to the media’s handling of the Helen Thomas issue, Stewart addresses another equally weighty subject—the relationship journalists have with their sources and the figures they cover.

    “It’s fun to see politicians and the people we count on to hold them accountable super-soaking each other,” Stewart dryly notes. “Are you journalists, or are you rushing a sorority?”

    The perception of bias is as damaging as actual bias. That’s one of the first things they teach in any journalism class. I’m not advocating against journalists having fun or even being on relatively amicable terms with those they cover. But journalists need to exercise extreme caution whenever they mix pleasure with business.

    Bottom line: Before you super-soak Joe Biden think, “Would this picture damage my credibility?”

Page 3 of 3«123