Archive for August, 2010

  • First Day of School

    1

    My summer will officially end at 2:50 p.m. when I go to my first class of my last year in college. With the start of a new year comes a plethora of opportunities—you can anyone you want to be (why yes, I will take that flier to try out for your a cappella group and Bhangra dance troupe!). Fortunately, though, I know I want to be a journalist, and I have spent the past three summers working to ease the transition from student-journalist to professional, paid, real-person, real-job journalist (by the way, my resume and clips pages are all up to date with this summer’s activities).

    While they don’t get paid and normally don’t get published by traditional media outlets during the year, student-journalists are still journalists. As Robert Niles of the Knight Digital Media Center points out in his advise for journalism students blog post, the career of a student-journalist has already begun.

    His other advice includes:

    • Everyone who posts online has the potential to be a journalist. Immediate access to a global publishing medium allows any source to become a breaking news reporter, even if it is only for a fleeting moment.
    • Your career is only as strong as your network. Networking has taken a digital turn thanks to the rise of social media. Now, you no longer have to have met someone in the flesh to make a professional connection.
    • Get passionate about a field and start to master it. Niles recommends turning it into a second major. My second major, for the record, is Spanish—I consider it a tool to hopefully allow me to reach more people and travel across the globe.
    • Conduct yourself as a journalist, at all times, and never stop reporting. This goes back to bullet point number one: anything posted online has to potential to be newsworthy to someone else. Journalists by definition are unbiased and open-minded—any hint of bias could come back to become your own personal Kate Moss cocaine scandal.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • USA Today cuts staff, shifts focus

    1

    Community papers have been feeling the effects of print journalism’s secular decline for years. Now the shrinkage is rising to the top of the befuddled industry.

    Yesterday, Gannett, the publisher of USA Today, announced the paper will transmogrify by increasing collaboration between the news and business departments in an attempt to make the paper more attractive to marketers. In other words, the separation between Church and State (the business side of the newsroom from the editorial side) will cease to exist.

    Gone are section editors that oversaw the various parts of the paper. Gone are 130 jobs, a 9 percent reduction in the workforce of the second-largest paper in the U.S. by circulation. Instead, USA Today plans to shift its focus from its print product to developing a “multi-media [sic] company” focusing on online and mobile distribution (you can see the full internal memo on the Gannett Blog, which is run by Jim Hopkins, a former USA Today reporter and editor).

    At this point, it is readily apparent that news organizations will need an online presence to survive in the future. Journalism, though, is by definition a search for truth and accuracy that is free of bias and outside influences, like business and finance, that would cloud its mission to report the facts in an accurate fashion.

    Yes, USA Today’s average daily circulation in the six months through March declined 14 percent to 1.8 million, compared with an drop of 8.7 percent for the industry as a whole, according to Audit Bureau of Circulations data. And yes, ad revenue declined 29 percent in 2009 and by 11 percent in the first quarter. At a publicly-traded company like Gannett, declines such as these are unacceptable to shareholders (the shares have dropped 16 percent this year). The company clearly needs to go in a different direction—the numbers tell that truth—but betraying one of the central commandments of journalism in an attempt to do so is enough to send a shiver down any idealistic spine.

    USA Today has been a pioneer since it debuted its content-light and color-heavy pages back in 1982. Whether the “busintorial” model becomes the new industry standard remains to be seen.

  • Facebook and Media Partnership

    0

    I’ve previously blogged about Facebook’s potential to help journalists and small websites like mine. Last month, Justin Osofsky, Facebook’s head of media partnerships, detailed more of Facebook’s power to help the media.

    In a post titled, Working with Media Organizations to Build Social News, Osofsky unveils information on driving traffic, increasing engagement and an analytics system that website managers can use to track the number of times their posts get liked or shared—and by whom.

    » Read the rest of the entry..

  • Poison Ivy or Sacred Walls?

    0

    UPDATE: Samantha Liss, one of my newest followers on Twitter and recent Missouri journalism school graduate, tweeted a link to this article from a Buffalo newspaper, which tackles this issue from a debt load perspective. Is a journalism graduate program worth many years of student loan payments? The two men interviewed in the article say yes.

    Recently, I heard a great analogy, one that you instantly commit to memory and will surely repeat a few times to others:

    Journalism is like art. We need someone to pay us to do it, and we’ll create masterpieces.

    I’ve made an entire life out of getting someone else to fund what I want to do (thanks Mom and Dad), but I’m sure that eventually I’ll be kicked out of my family’s financial nest and have to fly on my own. So maybe someday I’ll have to make a decision about paying for my own post-graduate school, like Leslie Minora wrote about in her blog post entitled Columbia Journalism School Is Worth Time and Money Even Though It Won’t Make You Rich; There, I Said It.

    Minora paid a sticker price of $51,156 for her 10-month program at Columbia Journalism School. The school estimates a total cost of $75,206 when you add in living expenses (food, rent, utilities, travel, personal). If you are thinking monetarily, this was her return on her investment (her words, not mine):

    • She’s working at her ninth internship, this one as a blogger for the Village Voice (she doesn’t say if its paid or not)
    • scraping by on rent with her parents’ help
    • eking out the rest of the summer on school health insurance

    I’m no stranger to a costly education. I will pay (correction: my parents will pay) $51,865 for my final year at Duke.  And I, too, am going into journalism, regardless of the practicality of my decision or lack thereof.  For a journalism student (and those funding one), money cannot be the main motivator. Instead, these have to be the type of returns used to measure your investment, courtesy of Minora:

    • a strange masochistic work ethic that allows her to find satisfaction in stress and poverty
    • a solid foundation of reporting and writing essentials
    • empowerment to break certain rules when you at least know they exist and can operate from a reasonably expansive body of knowledge (the difference between sounding like an imbecile and actually saying something intelligent)
    • a never-boring life

    Practical from a money standpoint? Nope. An infinitesimal beacon of hope that happiness transcends money? O yes. Keep fighting the good fight, Leslie, and maybe someday we can push our respective shopping carts full of our possessions together in Central Park and reminisce about the myriads of people we’ve talked to, places we’ve seen and events we’ve experienced.

    My trip to Fez, Morocco, last November was also priceless. This would be the herd of sheep that almost ran us over on the outskirts of the town.